Even though I generally agree with Jarrett, I believe there are more detrimental effects than those that were mentioned in the article. In my opinion, EdTech is giving students greater chances to succeed in their careers—for example, STEM education. The article by Jarrett talks about the individualization that EdTech provides to students learning, and I think it's a really important benefit. My only worry is about the interactions resulting from EdTech's growth. I do not necessarily agree that EdTech is creating a more engaging environment. I am concerned that as technology continues to evolve and offer several benefits for education it will only limit students’ ability to problem solve on their own due to them heavily relying on the technology that is readily available to them.
I do think that EdTech has made it more accessible for students to engage with their learning in and out of the classroom. Despite the accessibility it has provided students, I think that EdTech has also hindered students today and in the future. The overwhelming amount of technology that is seen in classrooms today I believe is causing a lack of social interaction and learning from peers. Research has shown that peer learning is a great way to increase students’ preparations for real-life scenarios as well as gain a greater understanding of diverse perspectives (Cornell University, para. 2). In today’s society, our children are communicating more through technology rather than having in person conversations and even struggling when having to interact face-to-face. I think it is important as an educator that technology is limited, especially in lower grades, to ensure students are establishing basic communication skills and learning from their peers in face-to-face interactions.

Comments
Post a Comment